That’s a big, big Superbowl.

Now, I’m not a huge football fan. In fact everything I know about football I’ve learned from playing football video games and, to a lesser extent, from playing on the Grafton High School JV squad my Sophomore year. I was a skinny and unathletic kid. I didn’t even like football. As near as I can tell, I only strapped that 10 pound helmet on to impress my brother and to try to meet girls. I failed on both counts and went through ten weeks of heck on that team without even learning the basics of the game.

But anyway, even though I’m not a big football fan, I still tune in like most of America and watch the Super bowl. This year I watched the big game on a big screen at a big place in Belltown called the The Big Picture.

The big screen at the Big Picture is about 30 feet across. Which gave me a big headache as soon as the big, big ads started to play. Why did these big ads give me such a big headache? Because, in my not so humble opinion, those big ads are a big, big, big waste of money.

The Theory goes like this:

The Super bowl is the most-watched television event of the year. Hundreds of millions of Americans tune in to see the game and, even better, a big chunk of them tune in just to see the ads. “The ads are the program,” these advertisers tell themselves. “People are actually eager to see us! This is a big opportunity to build our brands!”

So big ticket advertisers pay millions of dollars per spot. They spend millions of dollars a spot to talk to America. And what do they tell America?

Uh. Good question.

I watched the game end to end (the ‘Hawks played well. The refs made some bad calls. Pittsburgh has an amazing quarterback.) I saw every ad. But sitting here now, a couple hours later, all I remember is the comedy of pain. I remember

-A guy in a lawn chair falling through a house. (I think this was a beer commercial. I can’t remember which beer.)
-Office workers fighting toe to toe for beer bottles hidden like Easter eggs. (Again, I couldn’t name the beer.)
-Monkeys in an office. (Some job search site. Which one? Not sure. I’ll guess Monster, though I think I’m wrong.)
-Jay Moore being Diet Pepsi’s agent. (At least I remember the product, but I’m sure not about to go buy Pepsi instead of my beloved Sprite.)
-Some absurdist Burger King theatre (Funny, but does this really move big macs? Err. I mean Whoppers?)
-A big Robot and a Giant monster giving birth to a Hummer. (So, the core benefit of a Hummer is that it’s monstrous? I really thought this was going to be a hybrid ad.)

I’m sure I could dig through my brain and come up with a few more, but the point is this: Most of these ads aren’t selling anything. Most of these ads are comedy sketches dressed up like marketing because the Madison Avenue pros who put these spots together think that being laughed at is the same thing as building a brand. Most of these ads are pointless and utterly ineffective and all of these ads (including the few that were actually on topic) are going to lose money for the people who paid to have them produced.

It’s enough to make an ethical marketer cry.

I can only hope that there’s a special corner of marketing hell set aside for the media buyers and spiky-haired creatives who suggest massively expensive Super bowl ads as a “great way to get your name out there” and to “convert brand loyalty” or whatever other jargon they use to justify their existence.



Comments

  1. Daniel Talsky February 6th

    Comment Arrow

    Well, for one thing, you can watch all the ads on google video now…so you could go back and link to them or rewatch them:
    http://video.google.com/superbowl.html

    As for the effectiveness, they are widely considered to be loss-leaders like flagship stores in major cities. They send the primary message, “We’re pimp enough to be able to afford this.” I think they must be effective on some level to command the price. It’s not just because it’s the most watched show, it’s because people believe it means prestige.

    Even to someone with a lot of marketing savvy under my belt, I still do note what companies do ads and it changes my perception of them.

    However, I have to say, bigtime internet registrar godaddy.com came off as a ghetto pretender with their pathetic attempt at a super bowl ad.

    I notice they ran it two or three times though, and that google has another 3 or 4 ads. Maybe those ones are better, I didn’t bother watching them.


  2. Dennis Dilday February 17th

    Comment Arrow

    Not sure if it makes your point, and I’m not any particular kind of marketing guy, but I saw media spots about the superbowl ads and had pretty much the same thoughts you expressed: “What are they selling?” (just out of curiosity).

    I’ve noticed that happening a few times and wondered if there are several serial type ads that have something linking them and if you were to watch enough of them you would make the connections and be impressed… but I don’t watch enough.

    I also don’t (or haven’t) blogged much, but I decided to cruise through the Biznik Blogger’s blogs and see what I would find. Glad I did.


  3. Chris June 25th

    Comment Arrow

    I’ll agree with you that most of these ads are pure trash and you’ve really got to be watching to figure out what some of these are trying to sell. But on another note, although these ads really don’t seem to be selling anything they still promote or trigger an emotional response which digs deep into your subconscious. Who’s right, do these ads really work?


Add Yours

  • Author Avatar

    YOU


Comment Arrow



About Author

Chris Haddad

Chris "Mr. Moneyfingers" Haddad... Results-based marketing consultant, frankly-awesome direct response copywriter, strangely good dancer, capitalist hippie and all around great guy. On this site he shares all sorts of tips and tricks on how to make good money in bad times... opines fiercely on things that matter to him and occasionally goes a tad bit nuts. Plus he can do that thing with his eyebrow.