<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Hype Dead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moneyfingersinc.com/is-hype-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moneyfingersinc.com/is-hype-dead/</link>
	<description>Magic Words That Make You Rich</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mara</title>
		<link>http://www.moneyfingersinc.com/is-hype-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>Mara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 06:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://haddadink.com/blog/?p=13#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say it depends on your product and your target.  

For instance, doing marketing for higher ed, &quot;hype&quot; still appears to carry water with our older learners (the folks going back to school to train for a second or third career), while it doesn&#039;t track at all with the prospective freshmen.  The teen market (and increasingly, the 20-something market we belong to), is automatically suspicious of hype.  Scads of articles have been written about the MTV generation, and how we&#039;ve had to filter through ads all our lives.  For the folks who don&#039;t even remember when MTV played videos, it&#039;s that much more.  For them, hype is beyond dead; companies lie and they know it.

For the folks who are somewhat older, however, habits are hard to break.  There&#039;s more fatigue there than there was 10 or even 5 years ago, but it&#039;s not gone.  They don&#039;t take it as a given that ads lie the way younger folks do.  They also haven&#039;t had the same kind of media saturation - and thus aren&#039;t as efficient filterers.  For them, &quot;hype&quot; really can work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say it depends on your product and your target.  </p>
<p>For instance, doing marketing for higher ed, &#8220;hype&#8221; still appears to carry water with our older learners (the folks going back to school to train for a second or third career), while it doesn&#8217;t track at all with the prospective freshmen.  The teen market (and increasingly, the 20-something market we belong to), is automatically suspicious of hype.  Scads of articles have been written about the MTV generation, and how we&#8217;ve had to filter through ads all our lives.  For the folks who don&#8217;t even remember when MTV played videos, it&#8217;s that much more.  For them, hype is beyond dead; companies lie and they know it.</p>
<p>For the folks who are somewhat older, however, habits are hard to break.  There&#8217;s more fatigue there than there was 10 or even 5 years ago, but it&#8217;s not gone.  They don&#8217;t take it as a given that ads lie the way younger folks do.  They also haven&#8217;t had the same kind of media saturation &#8211; and thus aren&#8217;t as efficient filterers.  For them, &#8220;hype&#8221; really can work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

